UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ

No. 71-2145.

452 F.2d 1389 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 21, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan Saltzman, of Saltzman & Goldin, Hollywood, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Thomas G. Kontos, Asst. U.S. Atty., Barbara Meiers, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and ELY, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this judge-tried bank robbery case is affirmed. We find no merit in the appeal.

An attack is made on the sufficiency of the evidence. It is true that many little pieces of the evidence meant little by themselves, but put together, they were entirely adequate.

A point is made about the scope of cross examination of Lopez exceeding the scope of direct. The cross examination about an event after the robbery was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases