OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Convicted of receiving stolen property in violation of NRS 205.275, appellant's principal assignment of error is that there was a break in the "chain of custody" of corpus of the theft, between the time it was recovered and the time it was introduced into evidence at appellant's trial. In the facts of this case, we believe the chain of custody was adequately established. Cf. Eisentrager v. State, 79 Nev. 38,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.