UNITED STATES v. RUSSELL

No. 71-2494.

453 F.2d 1379 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Charles RUSSELL, Defendant and Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 10, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isidoor Bornstein (argued), of Bornstein & Bergstrom, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Jerry Cimmet, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., James Daffer, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, TRASK and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this judge-tried criminal case.

The defendant committed the act involved in the indictment. The question was on his sanity measured by Wade v. United States, 9th Cir., 426 F.2d 64 (1970).

We conclude the trial court could find Russell sane beyond a reasonable doubt, and we should not disturb...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases