MECHANICS NAT. BANK OF BURL. CTY. v. BRADY


121 N.J. Super. 62 (1972)

296 A.2d 78

MECHANICS NATIONAL BANK OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, APPELLANT, v. JAMES C. BRADY, JR., COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 19, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William F. Tompkins argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. William F. Dowd, on the Brief).

Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General, attorney for respondent James C. Brady, Jr., filed a Statement in Lieu of Brief (Mr. T. Robert Zochowski, Deputy Attorney General, of Counsel).

Mr. Edward Suski, Jr., argued the cause for respondent Fidelity Bank and Trust Company (Messrs. Wilinski, Coruzzi & Suski, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEONARD and CARTON.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Mechanics' contention that it had home office protection within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 17:9A-19 at the time the Commissioner approved Fidelity's branch office application is without merit. As of the date of this approval Mechanics had not yet passed the necessary shareholder's amendment to its Articles of Association and no formal certificate authorizing it to relocate its home office had been issued by the Comptroller of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases