1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 468 F.2d
  5. 468 F.2d 1359 (1972)
 

LOCKLIN v. DAY-GLO COLOR CORP.

Nos. 26239 and 26266.

468 F.2d 1359 (1972)

Harry P. LOCKLIN and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, dba Radiant Color Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DAY-GLO COLOR CORP., Defendant-Appellee. Harry P. LOCKLIN and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, dba Radiant Color Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DAY-GLO COLOR CORP., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 1, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Murtha (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Thomas V. Koykka (argued), Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, MERRILL and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

This case has already been before the court three times. On the first occasion we upheld the validity of the Kazenas patent and found two resins manufactured and marketed by Locklin to be infringing. Locklin v. Switzer Bros., 299 F.2d 160 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied 369 U.S. 861, 82 S.Ct. 950, 8 L.Ed. 2d 18 (1962). On the second and third occasions we considered whether a resin known as "4-C" was also infringing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases