FRY v. FRY


501 P.2d 1303 (1972)

Alberta Ann FRY, Respondent, v. Robert Frederick FRY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 3, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam B. Harbison, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were G.W. Kellington, and Harbison, Kellington, Kellington & Davis, Medford.

Gregory T. Hornecker, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Blackhurst, Hornecker & Hassen, Medford.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and THORNTON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The sole issue on this appeal is the amount of child support that was awarded to the mother, who was given custody of the three children involved. While the amount was substantial, in view of the relevant evidence offered and received, we cannot say that the trial judge's conclusion was not supported by the evidence, or that it was unreasonable.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases