1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 8 Cal.3d
  5. 8 Cal.3d 168 (1972)
 

TAKEHARA v. H.C. MUDDOX CO.

Docket No. Sac. 7941.

8 Cal.3d 168 (1972)

501 P.2d 913

104 Cal. Rptr. 345

GEORGE TAKEHARA et al., Plaintiffs, v. H.C. MUDDOX COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent; MISSION CLAY PRODUCTS, Claimant and Respondent; JOHN A. McGUINN et al., Claimants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 20, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arnold M. Greenberg for Claimants and Appellants.

Cottrell, Hofvendahl & Roessler, Russell V. Roessler, Kraft & Kraft and Eleanor M. Kraft for Claimant and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

PETERS, J.

The parties to this appeal are all judgment creditors of H.C. Muddox Company. Muddox recovered a judgment for $24,000 against certain parties not involved in this appeal on July 16, 1968. Prior thereto, on October 20, 1965, Mission Clay Products, respondent herein, obtained an order granting it a lien on the Muddox cause of action and any subsequent judgment pursuant to section 688.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases