UNITED STATES v. DE SMET

No. 71-2811.

456 F.2d 1311 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Joel Mark DE SMET, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 11, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes & Bassoni, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, & Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the "call" process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.

However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases