IN RE BLOOM


60 N.J. 113 (1972)

286 A.2d 497

IN THE MATTER OF HARRY BLOOM, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 24, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Sr. appeared on behalf of the Hudson County Ethics Committee.

Mr. Harry Bloom, Pro se.


PER CURIAM.

A complaint by Michael Kowal was filed with the Hudson County Ethics Committee charging respondent Harry Bloom, an attorney at law of this State, with falsely representing to Kowal that he had instituted an action for damages in Kowal's behalf.

Respondent was retained to represent Kowal in the Municipal Court with respect to assault and battery charges made by and against Kowal arising out of a fight with one Caiola. Respondent also was retained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases