TANNER v. PENDLETON TOOL INDUSTRIES


497 P.2d 1230 (1972)

In the matter of the Compensation of Eloise TANNER, Claimant. Eloise Tanner, Respondent, v. PENDLETON TOOL INDUSTRIES, Inc., a California Corporation, Dba P & C Tool Company, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided June 9, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew F. Fink, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson & Schwabe, Portland.

Robert A. Bennett, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Willner, Bennett & Leonard, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and THORNTON, JJ.


SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

In this workman's compensation case the employer is appealing from a decision of the circuit court which remanded claimant's case to the hearing officer for the taking of additional evidence pursuant to ORS 656.298(6) which states in pertinent part:

"(6) The circuit court review shall be by a judge * * * on the entire record forwarded by the board. The judge may remand the case to the hearing officer for further evidence taking, correction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases