UNITED STATES v. MEADOWS

No. 71-1436.

453 F.2d 1256 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Donald MEADOWS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 10, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Arkovitz, Nashville, Tenn., for defendant-appellant.

Ira E. Parker, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee; Charles H. Anderson, U.S. Atty., Nashville, Tenn., on brief.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

James Meadows appeals his perjury conviction on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm.

In July 1970 Harold Meadows, appellant's brother, was tried in United States District Court on a Dyer Act charge. James, in supplying an alibi for his brother, testified as follows:

"Q Was your brother (Harold Meadows) working for you on March 5th and 6th? "A Yes. * * * * * *

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases