1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 497 P.2d
  5. 497 P.2d 1183 (1972)
 

OWINGS v. ROSE

497 P.2d 1183 (1972)

Nathaniel A. OWINGS et al., Respondents and Cross-Appellants, v. Rowland S. ROSE et al., Appellants and Cross-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 1, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart M. Whipple, Portland, argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents. On the briefs were Seitz, Whipple & Johansen, Portland.

Lamar Tooze, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants. With him on the briefs were Tooze, Kerr & Peterson, Stephen R. Frank, E. Richard Bodyfelt, and Michael J. Gentry.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, HOLMAN, TONGUE, and HOWELL, JJ.

McALLISTER, Justice.

This is an action for indemnity. The plaintiffs are architects, who employed the defendants as consulting engineers on two construction projects and contend that on both jobs they had to pay damages on account of the negligence of defendants in the performance of their engineering services. The jury found for plaintiffs on their first cause of action and defendants appeal. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs' second cause of action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases