1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 470 F.2d
  5. 470 F.2d 1174 (1972)
 

ESPINOZA v. ROGERS

No. 72-1667.

470 F.2d 1174 (1972)

Phillip Alfonso ESPINOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rollie R. ROGERS, Colorado State Public Defender, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 27, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip Alfonso Espinoza, pro se.

Thomas M. Van Cleve, III, Deputy State Public Defender, has filed a memorandum in support of summary affirmance for appellees.

Before PICKETT, McWILLIAMS and DOYLE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a federal civil rights action brought by plaintiff Espinoza against the defendants in their capacities as attorneys for the Colorado Public Defender's Office. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983; 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Espinoza claims that he was denied due process and equal protection of the law because the defendants grossly mishandled and neglected legal matters which he had requested that they prosecute.

Specifically, Espinoza alleges numerous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases