1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 353 F.Supp.
  5. 353 F.Supp. 1264 (1972)
 

GOLOB v. NAUMAN VANDERVOORT, INC.

Civ. No. C-71-15.

353 F.Supp. 1264 (1972)

Jack GOLOB et al., Plaintiffs, v. NAUMAN VANDERVOORT, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, W. D.

On Motion for Reconsideration July 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman Rubinoff, Spengler, Nathanson, Heyman McCarthy & Durfee, Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

E. Thomas Maguire, Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, Toledo, Ohio, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

DON J. YOUNG, District Judge:

This cause came to be heard on motion of the defendant for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant has filed a memorandum and reply memorandum in support thereof, although it did not seek leave of this Court to file the latter. Plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion for summary judgment.

It is axiomatic that in a motion for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases