BURESH v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK


500 P.2d 1063 (1972)

In the matter of the Estate of William A. Seman, Deceased. Lorraine M. BURESH, Respondent, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK of Oregon, a National Banking Association, Executor of the Estate of William A. Seman, Deceased, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided September 8, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold D. Gillis, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. On brief were Butler, Husk & Gleaves, Eugene.

Sidney E. Thwing, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief were Thwing, Atherly & Butler, Eugene.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FOLEY, JJ.


LANGTRY, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a decree holding that William A. Seman was a domiciliary of California and California law governs in the construction of his will; that the application of that law requires that a trust created by paragraph Second of his will be held invalid; and that the estate be distributed to plaintiff under Oregon's intestacy statutes.

Some of the background facts for understanding of this litigation are recited in Buresh v. First...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases