JOHNSON & JOHNSON v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 977-69.

345 F.Supp. 1216 (1972)

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Civil Division.

June 27, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, Newark, N. J., by Dickinson R. Debevoise, Newark, N. J., Norman St. Landau, New Brunswick, N. J., and Daphne R. Leeds, Mason, Fenwick & Lawrence, Washington, D. C., of counsel for plaintiff.

Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, Newark, N. J., by Virginia D. Fenton and Walter I. Seligsohn, Newark, N. J., of counsel, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, New York City, Milton R. Wessel, and Guy M. Blynn, New York City, of counsel for defendant.


OPINION

GARTH, District Judge:

Plaintiff, Johnson & Johnson (hereinafter "Johnson") manufactures and sells an adult talcum powder having deodorant properties bearing the trademark "Shower to Shower." Defendant, Colgate-Palmolive (hereinafter "Colgate") manufactures and sells an aerosol deodorant and anti-perspirant bearing the trademark "Hour After Hour." The central issue presented here, and the test to be met by the plaintiff, is whether all the competent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases