ABRAMSON, ET AL. v. FARRELL


122 N.J. Super. 30 (1972)

298 A.2d 705

HYMAN S. ABRAMSON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JOHN J. FARRELL, CHIEF EXAMINER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT. ROBERT J. BERISH ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JOHN J. FARRELL, CHIEF EXAMINER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF THE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, REPRESENTING CERTAIN PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION — HAY APPEAL. ROBERT MICAI, WILLIAM BROWN, ORVILLE ABBOTT, GEORGE HUTCHINSON, JOSEPH R. SMITH, JOHN SHANER, AND HENRY JUSTUS, APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT. NICHOLAS C. MAIDA, APPELLANT, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF STATE COLLEGE LIBRARIANS, I AND II, 10 MONTHS AND 12 MONTHS — HAY APPEAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE DISTRICT INHERITANCE TAX SUPERVISORS, HAY REPORT APPEALS. IN THE MATTER OF SENIOR APPEALS EXAMINERS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HAY REPORT APPEAL.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 12, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William S. Greenberg argued the causes for appellants Abramson et al.; Berish et al.; Professional Association, New Jersey State Department Of Education, and State College Librarians (Messrs. Sterns and Greenberg, attorneys; Mr. William S. Greenberg, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Robert J. Partlow argued the cause for appellants Robert Micai et al. (Messrs. Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys).

Mr. Mario H. Volpe argued the cause for appellant Nicholas C. Maida.

Mr. Ernest Gross argued the cause for appellants District Inheritance Tax Supervisors (Messrs. Gross, Weissberger & Linett, attorneys).

Mr. William J. Walsh argued the cause for appellants Senior Appeals Examiners, Department of Labor and Industry (Messrs. Scott, Fox & Walsh, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore A. Winard, Assistant Attorney General, argued the causes for respondent (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General, attorney).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LORA and ALLCORN.


PER CURIAM.

The above-entitled appeals were argued at the same time. Since most of the questions involved and the arguments for reversal are substantially similar in all eight cases, this opinion will deal with all of them.

The appellants are State employees who appeal from the salaries allocated to their job titles by the Civil Service Commission (hereafter Commission). The steps that led up to the appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases