1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 353 F.Supp.
  5. 353 F.Supp. 1126 (1972)
 

SMITH v. CINCINNATI POST & TIMES STAR

No. 8082.

353 F.Supp. 1126 (1972)

Rufus Lee SMITH, Plaintiff, v. The CINCINNATI POST & TIMES STAR et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

June 29, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey B. Woods, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Harry M. Hoffheimer, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

PORTER, District Judge.

In this case the essence of the complaint is that the defendants willfully published material of a telephone conversation in violation of the Federal Wiretap Laws (18 U.S.C. § 2511). Jurisdiction is laid under 18 U.S.C. § 2520. This section authorizes a civil action by "any person whose wire or oral communication is intercepted, disclosed or used in violation of this chapter." Defendants have moved for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases