1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 120 N.J.
  5. 120 N.J. Super. 26 (1972)
 

STATE v. MALASPINA

120 N.J. Super. 26 (1972)

293 A.2d 224

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANGELO MALASPINA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 7, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sanford Schneider argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. De Rose, Serratelli & Schneider, attorneys; Mr. Ralph C. De Rose, of counsel).

Mr. David Noah Dubrow, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, MATTHEWS and FRITZ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was indicted by an Essex County grand jury under several indictments for violations of the gambling laws. Under Indictment 2213-69 he was charged with possession of lottery memoranda (N.J.S.A. 2A:121-3), and with working for a lottery (N.J.S.A. 2A:121-3, subd. a). Under Indictment 2212-69 he was charged with bookmaking (N.J.S.A. 2A:112-3). Under Indictment 2205-69 he was charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases