1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 470 F.2d
  5. 470 F.2d 975 (1972)
 

SCHWINN BICYCLE CO. v. MURRAY OHIO MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 72-1158.

470 F.2d 975 (1972)

SCHWINN BICYCLE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MURRAY OHIO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 24, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Lucas, Chicago, Ill., Malcolm McCaleb, Horton, Davis, McCaleb & Lucas, Chicago, Ill., Robert C. Hendon, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for plaintiff-appellant.

Edward M. Prince, Washington, D. C., C. Willard Hayes, Washington, D. C., W. W. Berry, Bass, Berry & Sims, Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for defendant-appellee.

Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and WELLFORD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court's judgment for Defendant-Appellee, Murray Ohio, in a suit by Plaintiff-Appellant, Schwinn, seeking damages and injunctive relief against Murray Ohio's alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition.1 Because the District Court's Memorandum Opinion, appearing at 339 F.Supp. 973, thoroughly sets forth the factual and legal bases for that Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases