1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 455 F.2d
  5. 455 F.2d 974 (1972)
 

UNITED STATES v. SUTTON

Nos. 26715, 26717.

455 F.2d 974 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul David SUTTON, Lawrence Bernard Graham, Jr., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 7, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee A. Holley (argued), Seattle, Wash., for Paul David Sutton.

Max Gest (argued), Richard P. Fox, Los Angeles, Cal., for Lawrence Bernard Graham, Jr.

Lyn I. Goldberg, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Chief Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and CARTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

The appellants from material outside the record make a showing that the main prosecuting witness may have testified falsely. This is a matter that can now be the subject of a motion for a new trial. We give no indication as to what the ruling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases