1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 496 P.2d
  5. 496 P.2d 912 (1972)
 

DICKSON v. HOLLINGER

496 P.2d 912 (1972)

Viola V. DICKSON, Respondent, v. Gladys Mae HOLLINGER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided May 11, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn D. Ramirez, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Ramirez & Hoots, Klamath Falls.

Stuart E. Foster, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frohnmayer & Deatherage, Medford.

DENECKE, Justice.

The plaintiff was injured in an automobile collision. In the first trial the jury returned a verdict against the plaintiff; however, upon appeal, we reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. Dickson v. Hollinger, 257 Or. 89, 476 P.2d 557 (1970). At the second trial the jury found for the plaintiff and the defendant is now the appellant.

The defendant has made 11 assignments of error. We hold they are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases