1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 494 P.2d
  5. 494 P.2d 904 (1972)
 

CHIMENTI v. CHIMENTI

494 P.2d 904 (1972)

Helen Jean CHIMENTI, Respondent, v. Frank Louis CHIMENTI, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided March 30, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry F. Samuels, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Vergeer, Samuels, Roehr & Sweek, Portland.

DeMar L. Batchelor, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor & Bailey, Hillsboro.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FOLEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from only that portion of a divorce decree which made division of the property between the parties. We have examined the record in our de novo review and conclude that a recitation of the facts of the property division will serve no purpose. It is sufficient to say we cannot disagree with the division made by the trial court.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases