1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 494 P.2d
  5. 494 P.2d 901 (1972)
 

RIDDEL v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

494 P.2d 901 (1972)

In the matter of the Compensation of Leon RIDDEL, Claimant. Leon Riddel, Respondent, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided March 16, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Wiley Gould, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were McColloch, Dezendorf, Spears & Lubersky, Portland.

Donald S. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Green, Richardson, Griswold & Murphy, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FOLEY, JJ.

SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

In this workmen's compensation appeal the hearing officer, Workmen's Compensation Board and the circuit court all found that the claimant's failure to file his claim for compensation for injury within the statutory period provided by ORS 656.265(1),1 did not bar his claim, because he came within the good cause exception, ORS 656.265(4) (c). That statute reads:

"(4) Failure to give notice as required by this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases