1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 350 F.Supp.
  5. 350 F.Supp. 1008 (1972)
 

UNITED STATES v. VIGI

Crim. A. No. 46922.

350 F.Supp. 1008 (1972)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Orlando James VIGI et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

November 3, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence Leff, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

James K. O'Malley, Pittsburgh, Pa., Peter Moray, Louis E. Barden, Michael Abbruzzese, Edward Boggs, Detroit, Mich., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

The defendants have asked the court to suppress all wiretap evidence because such evidence was not obtained in conformity with 18 U.S.C. §§ 2516 and 2518.

Specifically, the motions filed by the various defendants raise the following issues:

1. The constitutionality of Title 18, Sections 2510-2518.

2. The validity of an authorization...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases