PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery. MCLA 750.529; MSA 28.797. Prior to the trial, the trial court conducted a Wade hearing to determine the admissibility of the identifications of defendant by three eyewitnesses to the robbery who identified defendant at a prior police lineup. In determining that the lineup and in-court identifications were admissible, the trial court found that under United States v Wade,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.