OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for cattle theft; the punishment, ten years imprisonment.
A resume of the evidence is unnecessary to understand the appellant's grounds of error.
The appellant's first ground of error complains that the court erred in charging the jury at the guilt or innocence stage of the proceedings as to the penalty provided by law for the offense of cattle theft.
Since the 1967 amendment of Article...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
