1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 344 F.Supp.
  5. 344 F.Supp. 964 (1972)
 

DOE v. HODGSON

No. 72 Civ. 1816.

344 F.Supp. 964 (1972)

Jane DOE et al., Plaintiffs, v. James D. HODGSON, Secretary of Labor, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

June 7, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burt Neuborne, Norman Dorsen, New York Civil Liberties Union, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, for Federal Defendants; T. Gorman Reilly, New York City, of counsel.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., for the State of New York, for New York State Defendants; Irving L. Rollins, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

FRANKEL, District Judge.

The nine plaintiffs are agricultural laborers. Using fictitious names, they have brought the somewhat unusual form of action which is now before the court on their motion for the convening of a three-judge court. The "omnibus complaint," as the United States Attorney suitably styles it, names as defendants five federal officials—the Secretary of Labor, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Chairman of the N.L.R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases