AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INT'L v. C.A.B.

Nos. 24062, 24063, 24226.

458 F.2d 846 (1972)

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Command Airways, Inc., Intervenors. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Air North, Inc., Intervenors. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided January 14, 1972.

Petition for Rehearing Denied March 22, 1972.

Petition for Rehearing Denied April 13, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gary Green, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Mr. Robert L. Toomey, Atty., Civil Aeronautics Board, with whom Messrs. R. Tenney Johnson, Gen. Counsel, O. D. Ozment, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Warren L. Sharfman, Associate Gen. Counsel, Litigation and Research, Stephen H. Lachter, Atty., Civil Aeronautics Board, and Howard E. Shapiro, Atty., Department of Justice, were on the brief for respondent.

Mr. John H. Quinn, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Frank J. Costello, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for intervenors in Nos. 24,062-3. Mr. Russell A. Garman, Jr., Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for intervenors in Nos. 24,062-3.

Before FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and McGOWAN and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges.


Respondent's Petition for Rehearing Denied March 22, 1972.

Intervenors' Petition for Rehearing Denied April 13, 1972.

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:

These cases concern challenges by the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) to orders of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) which authorize certain certificated carriers1 to suspend service at specified locations; approve agreements between those...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases