1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 501 P.2d
  5. 501 P.2d 795 (1972)
 

MEYER v. HARVEY ALUMINUM

501 P.2d 795 (1972)

Wilson J. MEYER and Mary Ann Meyer, Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. HARVEY ALUMINUM (Incorporated), a California Corporation, and Harvey Aluminum of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided October 9, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fredric A. Yerke, and Douglas M. Ragen, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With them on the briefs were Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Samuel O. Pruitt, Jr., Richard D. Hall, Los Angeles, Cal., and Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland.

Arden E. Shenker and Lamar Tooze, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With Mr. Tooze on the brief were Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, DENECKE, HOLMAN, HOWELL, BRYSON and LANGTRY, JJ.

DENECKE, Justice.

Plaintiffs obtained a judgment in the sum of approximately one-half million dollars for injuries to their fruit crops and trees caused by emissions from defendants' aluminum plant. Defendants appeal.

I

Qualifications of Opinion Witness

Plaintiffs recovered damages for the excessive number of apricot culls, apparently, only for the year 1965. The only evidence that an excessive number of culls was caused by fluorides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases