1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 339 F.Supp.
  5. 339 F.Supp. 942 (1972)
 

BAKER v. F & F INVESTMENT

No. M 8 85.

339 F.Supp. 942 (1972)

Charles BAKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. F & F INVESTMENT et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

February 16, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Stifler, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City, of counsel.

Pollack & Singer, New York City, for respondent Alfred Balk; Martin I. Kaminsky, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

BONSAL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for an order pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure compelling the witness Alfred Balk to answer questions propounded to him during oral deposition taken on June 7, 1971 pursuant to subpoena.

On July 14, 1962, the Saturday Evening Post published an article written by Alfred Balk entitled "Confessions of a Block-Buster — A Chicago real-estate agent who moves Negro families...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases