1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 464 F.2d
  5. 464 F.2d 804 (1972)
 

SOUTHEAST NEIGHBORS, INC. v. WASHINGTON MET. AREA TRANSIT

Nos. 71-1244, 71-1391.

464 F.2d 804 (1972)

SOUTHEAST NEIGHBORS, INC. and Walter H. Dodd, Petitioners, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION, Respondent, WMA Transit Company, Intervenor. Gilbert HAHN, Jr., Chairman, District of Columbia City Council, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION, Respondent, WMA Transit Company, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 15, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mrs. Jean Camper Cahn, Washington, D. C., submitted on the brief for petitioners in No. 71-1244. Mr. Charles H. Lohah, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioners in No. 71-1244.

Mr. Gilbert Hahn, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Edward B. Webb, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 71-1391.

Mr. Douglas N. Schneider, Jr., Washington, D. C., submitted on the brief for respondent in No. 71-1244. Mr. Stephen L. Sharfman also entered an appearance for respondent in No. 71-1244.

Mr. Bernard Dobranski, Alexandria, Va., for respondent in No. 71-1391. Mr. Douglas N. Schneider, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief for respondent in No. 71-1391.

Mr. Stanley H. Kamerow, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Allan L. Kamerow and Solomon L. Margolis, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for intervenor. (submitted on the brief in No. 71-1244)

Before McGOWAN and TAMM, Circuit Judges, and A. SHERMAN CHRISTENSEN, U. S. Senior District Judge for the District of Utah.

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:

These two petitions to review rate orders of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission present essentially the same contentions. These are, in principal part, two in number. One is that the Commission either could not or should not have allowed WMA Transit Company, a common carrier by bus certificated to serve regular routes within and between the District of Columbia and adjoining areas of Maryland, any fare increase whatsoever with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases