PEASE v. TAYLOR

No. 5909.

496 P.2d 757 (1972)

Arthur E. PEASE, also known as Emery Arthur Pease, Appellant, v. Wesley S. TAYLOR, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

May 4, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ross & Crow, Carson City, for appellant.

Lester H. Berkson, Stateline, Jerry C. Lane, Carson City, for respondent.

Prince A. Hawkins, Hawkins, Rhodes & Hawkins and F. DeArmond Sharp, Reno, amicus curiae.


OPINION

ZENOFF, Chief Justice.

Respondent Taylor commenced this action against appellant Pease to recover $16,500, which he claimed was due under the terms of a 90-day promissory note, plus attorney's fee and costs. The note did not recite any interest rate but did provide that the makers, in case of suit (there were two other makers, but these were not named party defendants in this action), would pay all costs and expenses and such additional sums as the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases