1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 500 P.2d
  5. 500 P.2d 731 (1972)
 

BRIDGMAN v. STOUT

(No. 27115).

500 P.2d 731 (1972)

Catherine H. BRIDGMAN, Sometimes Known As Catherine H. Stout, Respondent, v. Rosario A. STOUT, Administratrix of the Estate of R.L. Stout, Aka Reynold Lee Stout, Deceased, et al., Defendants, Rosario A. Stout, Individually, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided September 8, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George D. Leonard, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on brief were Willner, Bennett & Leonard, Portland.

Melvin Goode, Albany, argued the cause for respondent. On brief were Raymond D. Matthies and Goode, Goode, Decker & Hinson, Albany.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and THORNTON, JJ.

LANGTRY, Judge.

Defendant Rosario A. Stout in her individual capacity appeals from a judgment declaring that plaintiff Catherine H. Bridgman is the exclusive owner of certain real property located in Yamhill County. The plaintiff and decedent R.L. Stout acquired the property at a time while they were living together, purportedly as husband and wife. The deed by which they took title conveyed to them as "Reynold L. Stout and Catherine H. Stout, husband and wife." In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases