1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 503 P.2d
  5. 503 P.2d 722 (1972)
 

OREMUS v. OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY

503 P.2d 722 (1972)

In the matter of the Compensation of Daniel OREMUS, Claimant. Daniel Oremus, Plaintiff, v. The OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY and the Oregon Journal, Respondents, Albert Leibrand, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 1, 1972.

Review Denied January 30, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Mize, Kriesien, Fewless, Cheney & Kelley, Portland.

Thomas M. Triplett, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Wayne A. Williamson and Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson & Schwabe, Portland. Also of counsel: W.F. Lubersky, Michael G. Holmes and McColloch, Dezendorf, Spears & Lubersky, Portland.

Before LANGTRY, P.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.

FOLEY, Judge.

This case was remanded by this court for the determination of who was or were the true employer or employers of Daniel Oremus. See 3 Or.App. 92, 470 P.2d 162, Sup.Ct. review denied (1970). The Workmen's Compensation Board found that The Oregonian was the true employer and should reimburse Mr. Leibrand, the newspaper distributor, for compensation paid or payable. The board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases