BROSE v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY

No. 29816.

455 F.2d 763 (1972)

Horace B. BROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 26, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl V. Wisner, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., John Cyril Malloy, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Peter J. Wisners, Tampa, Fla., G. Franklin Rothwell, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.


JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge.

This appeal is taken by Brose from the Trial Court's dismissal, at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, of a qui tam informer's suit alleging "mismarking" under 35 U.S.C.A. § 292.1 The Trial Court found that Appellant failed to prove (i) falsity of the marking in issue, (ii) intent to deceive the public on the part of Sears, (iii) any marking by Sears, and (iv) that the marking was done to any "unpatented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases