PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted of grand larceny through the use of circumstantial evidence, some of which was hearsay. He appeals. We reverse.
The intricacies of the accounting proofs and relative contentions are well known to the state and the defendant via their respective briefs. It would serve no worth-while purpose to extend this opinion by recounting them. Suffice it to say the bulk of the incriminating testimony offered by the company president...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
