1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 28 Cal.App.3d
  5. 28 Cal.App.3d 1057 (1972)
 

TAYLOR v. MARTIN

Docket No. 29557.

28 Cal.App.3d 1057 (1972)

105 Cal. Rptr. 211

RUTH TAYLOR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT MARTIN, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

November 14, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Clifford Sweet, Thomas Schneider, Robert Goldstein, Henry Hewitt and Russell W. Galloway for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, and Asher Rubin, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

DRAPER, P.J.

(1) We cannot accept appellant's contention that the trial court was required to reweigh the evidence. In an administrative mandamus proceeding to review denial of welfare benefits, (this is such a proceeding), the trial court applies the substantial evidence rule, i.e., looks to the evidence before the administrative tribunal only to ascertain whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases