1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 190 S.E.2d
  5. 190 S.E.2d 856 (1972)
 

SHAMEL v. SHAMEL

No. 7221DC540.

190 S.E.2d 856 (1972)

Mary Lou Blevins SHAMEL v. Lawrence Martin SHAMEL.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 30, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

White & Crumpler, by James G. White and Michael J. Lewis, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff appellant.

Hatfield, Allman & Hall, by James W. Armentrout, Winston-Salem, for defendant appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant first assigns as error that certain of the findings of fact in the order appealed from are not supported by the evidence. This assignment is not brought forward in appellant's brief and no reason or argument is stated or authority cited in support of the exceptions upon which it is based. Therefore, these exceptions are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals. In any...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases