1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 38 A.D.2d
  5. 38 A.D.2d 979 (1972)
 

WHITE PLAINS URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. EINHORN

38 A.D.2d 979 (1972)

White Plains Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v. Joseph J. Einhorn et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 27, 1972

Order affirmed, without costs.

The case of City of Binghamton v. Arlington Hotel (30 A.D.2d 585 [Third Dept.]), relied upon by appellants, is inapplicable, for the rule in the Third Department (22 NYCRR 839.3) differs in language and scope from the rule in this Department (22 NYCRR 678.1). In affirming the order herein we are merely holding that the appraisals in question are not subject to pretrial disclosure. We reach no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases