OPINION
PER CURIAM.
A jury found defendant guilty of attempted aggravated robbery of a filling station in Minneapolis. On this appeal from the judgment of conviction, defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that certain in-custody statements of defendant were inadmissible because they were, as a matter of law, involuntary. The voluntariness of defendant's inculpatory statements was, by any standard,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.