There was sufficient proof of actionable negligence against defendant Bagon to make out a prima facie case. The question of notice should not have been ruled out since the jury could have determined that Bagon knew, or should have known, of the defect in the chair from the evidence that when Bagon took over the beauty parlor another chair, similarly broken in two parts, was found in the rear of the store. Also, the mere observation of the chair at the welded joinder of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
