Petitioner's testimony that respondent had sexual relations with her during the critical period is both uncorroborated and contradicted by respondent. Furthermore, there is believable testimony that petitioner did have intercourse with another person about that time. In fact, it appears that the petitioner initially pointed to this other person as the father of her child. Under these circumstances, the requirement that evidence of paternity must be more than merely preponderant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.