HAMILTON v. INVESTMENT TOWERS CORPORATION

No. 44562.

489 P.2d 488 (1971)

Earl A. HAMILTON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. INVESTMENT TOWERS CORPORATION and Robert S. Uhls, Director, Building Inspection Department, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

September 28, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don Hamilton and Don J. Harr, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

Halley, Spradling, Stagner & Alpern, by John T. Spradling, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error, investment Towers Corp.

Roy H. Semtner, Municipal Counselor, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error, Robert S. Uhls, Building Inspector.


McINERNEY, Justice:

A variance under a zoning ordinance limiting height of structures was sought and obtained before a municipal board of adjustment. The decision was upheld upon appeal to the District Court. Plaintiffs in error appealed, seeking reversal of the district court judgment, and, necessarily, the decision by the municipal board.

After briefs were filed by plaintiffs in error and by the defendant in error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases