1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 262 Md.
  5. 262 Md. 710 (1971)
 

McGINNIS v. ROGERS

[No. 465, September Term, 1970.]

262 Md. 710 (1971)

279 A.2d 459

McGINNIS ET AL. v. ROGERS ET AL. URCIOLO ET AL. v. ROGERS

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 30, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles C.W. Atwater, with whom were David A. Carney and J. Edward Martin, Jr., on the brief, for Arthur J. McGinnis and Charles Dudley, part of appellants and cross-appellees. Richard T. Brice, IV, for Raphael G. Urciolo, part of appellants. No brief filed on behalf of Joseph Urciolo, other appellant.

C. Edward Hartman, II, with whom was Stanley E. Hartman on the brief, for John J. Rogers, part of appellees. No brief filed on behalf of other appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

FINAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Upon the first argument of this case before this Court, the appellants were Arthur J. McGinnis and Charles Dudley, who, as complainants below and as the named contract purchaser and assignee had filed a bill for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land against John J. Rogers and Helen A. Rogers, his wife, and Thomas E. Chance. Also joined as defendants were Helen L. Clarke, Joseph Urciolo, John V. Arban...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases