CLARKE v. KERCHNER

No. 7118SC362.

181 S.E.2d 787 (1971)

11 N.C. App. 454

Earline H. CLARKE v. Charles E. KERCHNER and wife, Margaret B. Kerchner and Irene Taylor.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 23, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clark & Tanner by David M. Clark, Greensboro, for plaintiff appellant.

Perry C. Henson and Daniel W. Donahue, Greensboro, for defendant appellees Kerchner.


VAUGHN, Judge.

Appellant contends that the court erred in granting defendants' motion for a directed verdict. Before we can decide whether the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff was sufficient to be considered by the jury as to whether defendants breached a duty owed to plaintiff, we must decide (1) whether certain expert testimony should have been considered by the court below, and (2) what duty defendants owed plaintiff.

Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases