PER CURIAM.
This appeal is by the defendant below from his conviction, upon a jury trial, of the offense of grand larceny with which he had been charged by information. In seeking reversal, the appellant argued insufficiency of the evidence, and that the trial court erred in denying a motion of the defendant for mistrial and in rulings which permitted testimony of a non-listed state witness and which allowed the state to present certain testimony on rebuttal. Upon...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.