CAMERON v. CROCKER-CITIZENS NAT. BANK

Docket No. 36967.

19 Cal.App.3d 940 (1971)

97 Cal. Rptr. 269

JEAN CAMERON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CROCKER-CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 7, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ryan & Traxler, G. Bentley Ryan, Salyer & Bucknum and John C. Salyer for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Richard H. Wolford for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

KAUS, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment to the effect that she did not have an equitable interest in the estate of her former husband, Arthur Cameron.

FACTS

After a brief marriage, which followed a long courtship, plaintiff and Cameron were divorced in 1961. Although the property settlement agreement limited alimony payments to $1,000 per month for five years, Cameron generously supplemented these payments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases