XEROX CORP. v. CITY OF DETROIT

No. 34 January Term 1971, Docket No. 52,560.

384 Mich. 574 (1971)

184 N.W.2d 919

XEROX CORPORATION v. CITY OF DETROIT

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 5, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy (by Philip P. Van Zile II, Lawrence R. Van Til, and John H. Dudley, Jr.), for plaintiff.

Michael M. Glusac, Corporation Counsel, and Julius C. Pliskow and Lawrence W. Morgan, Assistants Corporation Counsel, for the City of Detroit.

William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, and Aloysius J. Suchy and William F. Koney, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for Wayne County.


PER CURIAM:

These consolidated actions were filed to recover personal property taxes paid under protest. Plaintiff Xerox moved for discovery of assessment records in possession of Detroit's Board of Assessors. The circuit judge granted discovery and ordered that Detroit produce such specific portions of those records as are identified in his order. The order declares and finds:

"Plaintiff's motion to require the production of certain designated documents in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases