The appellants' doctor testified that in his opinion a lipoma would not be caused by trauma, pressure, or irritation. However, he did not deny that there was some medical opinion to the contrary. The claimant's doctors acknowledged that lipomas could develop without any known pressure or traumatic irritation, but testified that constant irritation or pressure could cause a lipoma and that the claimant's lipoma was caused by irritation. The fact that the doctors were unable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
